| eypacnsibw | Date: Thursday, 21/11/2013, 18:33 | Post # 1 |
|
Sergeant
Group: Member
Message: 25
Status: Offline
|
When the U.S. Doe discovered five years ago that China had stolen some of America's most sensitive nuclear secrets, they focused their spy explore the nuclear weapons laboratory in Los Alamos. CBS News Correspondent Sharyl Attkisson reports Robert Vrooman, whose job would have been to oversee spy investigations with the lab, is now making a disturbing report that his superiors had tunnel vision, narrowing in on only 1 scientist -- Dr. Wen Ho Lee -- when there were many others who could have been guilty. "There are people who have been in this investigation from the beginning who believe that before they even started the investigation, that they had decided it turned out Lee," says Vrooman, former head of counterintelligence at Los Alamos.The investigators drew up a list of 70 suspects that included Lee. Then, they narrowed their list to 12. "It appeared to me as it was a bogus list, to obtain the appearance of doing a legitimate investigation," Vrooman says. "There's one person on there who doesn't have a clearance. There are additional people on there who don't have entry to nuclear weapons information. The investigators just told me, 'Well, look, I know it's Lee and ah, we merely need some other names to create this thing look good.'" Notra Trulock is the man credited with pushing the theory of Lee as the prime suspect from your very beginning. As the former head of one's department counterintelligence, he headed the department's spy search. "I don't even think there was any preconceived notion about Lee," Trulock insists. "I trust the investigation and the investigators that compiled that list." But Vrooman is not the first person to question the government's investigation of Lee. Lee remained the FBI's prime suspect even with field agents had cleared him and sent a memo to headquarters saying he has not been their man. Also, as CBS News reported two weeks ago, three Energy department polygraphers gave Lee passing scores over a lie detector test. The FBI reviewed the final results and said Lee had actually failed the testThe FBI and department point out that the inconsistencies don't mean Lee is innocent, and although he was never charged with espionage, Lee's trial for alleged computer and security violations will provide more insight into how he became their chief spy suspect. What's scary is that they may not know it because not all develop the telltale stooped posture.
(Source: Religioustolerance.org) On Monday, the Texans dicated to cut the amount of money they give to Southern Baptist seminaries by about 80 % next year and send the $4 million instead to a few moderate campuses in Texas. Also, the Texans virtually cut-off support for the denomination's headquarters in Nashville, Tenn., and its particular social-issues agency a cut amounting to $1 million.The Texans will still send some $19 million towards the denomination, mostly for missionary work in the United State and abroad.At trouble in the intra-Baptist dispute is how strictly to interpret the Bible.The Rev. Bob Campbell of Houston charged that professors on the Southern Baptist seminaries are being required to uphold the denomination's increasingly conservative doctrinal platform.Campbell said the seminaries "want your dollars. They do not want you."The Rev. Charles Wade, executive director of the Texas convention, told the meeting: "Jesus took his stand against religious authoritarianism, moral judgmentalism and dogmatic fundamentalism."The Texas Baptists will decide afterwards at the meeting whether to allow full participation for Baptists externally Texas. Observers say that opens the way in which for the Texas convention to become a regional body that could rival the country's denomination.The national leadership insists for the Bible's "inerrancy," or literal accuracy, interpreting Scripture in conservative terms.By RICHARD N. OSTLING There are new strong claims that the man Princess Diana really wanted to marry wasn't mall heir Dodi Al Fayed, reports CBS News Reporter Pamela McCall, but a Pakistani heart surgeon. The storyline is in a television documentary airing Tuesday in Britain. The former captain of Pakistan's Cricket team says Diana was crazy about doctor Hasnat Khan. Imran Khan claims Diana asked him in May 1997 to do something as a go between to broker a married relationship, even though the couple had break up after two years. The ending up in Doctor Khan didn't happen due to the Princess's death in car crash that August. The claim supports those made by other friends of Princess Diana that her relationship with Dodi Fayad was only a fling to make her soul mates jealous. Relatives of Doctor Khan also can be found in the documentary, speaking openly of the romance for the Princess.Before the Princess was killed in a vehicle crash in Paris in August 1997, she was reportedly in a relationship with the son of Harrods owner Mohammed Al Fayed, Dodi, who also died inside the accident.After the accident, Al Fayed said the princess and his son had been planning to marry.Imran doubts it. "It was clear that they was deeply in love with Dr. Hasnat i just don't think she would have got over it that quickly," he was quoted saying.The Channel 5 documentary, called Diana: Her Last Love states that while the princess was seen with Fayed before her death, she had been in touch with Hasnat's family advising them to never read anything significant in the relationship.Ashfaq Ahmed, Hasnat's great-uncle, tells the program: "I know with certainty that he (Hasnat) was greatly deeply in love with her, and he was greatly impressed by her personality. Not by her beauty - by her humanity."In June 1997, British newspapers reported that this princess and Hasnat had become engaged, a narrative that was denied by her spokesman.But the sunday paper by Diana's psychic healer and confidante Simone Simmons in November 1998 said that the princess and Hasnat had conducted an enthusiastic affair between 1995 and 1996.It said the connection ended because Hasnat was not comfortable about dealing with a highly public role together with the princess and her young sons. ©2000 CBS Worldwide Inc. All Rights Reserved. These toppers may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Reuters Limited brought about this report
A British court has decided controversial Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan still isn't welcome in great britan, reports CBS News Correspondent Sam Litzinger. A court of appeals panel said Louis Farrakhan has what it calls "notorious opinions" and a visit to Britain by him could provoke disorder, so the judges are backing the government's decision to maintain Farrakhan out. Nation of Islam solicitor Sabiq Khan referred to it as a blow to free speech."You have a man who's preaching a note of self-discipline, self-reliance, atonement and responsibility," he was quoted saying. "Even if it was right, that they says things that are shocking and offensive, is it right that he should be excluded to come to the U.K.?"The 68-year-old leader of the Chicago-based Nation of Islam was banned from Britain in 1986 since the government said he expressed views which were racist and anti-Semitic.Successive Home Secretaries (interior ministers) have refused him permission to enter but last year lawyers for Farrakhan challenged the ban inside the High Court, saying he previously "moved on" and was regarded in the us as a significant spokesperson for that black community.They claimed the ban was "an unlawful and disproportionate interference" with Farrakhan's to certainly communicate freely with his followers in the uk and was contrary to the Human Rights Act.Recently, High Court Justice Michael Turner had ruled from the ban, saying the government did not establish "objective justification" for excluding Farrakhan.The us government appealed and said it had top reasons to bar Farrakhan from entering the continent.Monica Carss-Frisk, an attorney representing Home Secretary David Blunkett, said in a hearing last month that he was "well famous for expressing anti-Semitic and racially divisive views, particularly at a time of political unrest in the center East."Ruling in favor of the government Tuesday, the 3 judges said the government ban took into consideration tensions in the Middle East and also the risk of public disorder prompted by a visit by the Chicago-based activist.Blunkett welcomed your choice and said Farrakhan's presence was "not conducive to good public order."Farrakhan's lawyer Nicholas Blake told the appeal court that his client became a spiritual and political voice from the African-American community in the United States since the ban was imposed in 1986."It is absurd to convey that this is a man that's a rabble rouser. He has never been convicted of any disorderly conduct as neither has anybody who attended his meetings," Blake said.Blake said Farrakhan had his message all over the world, to Commonwealth countries and even to Israel. The only country he not been allowed to visit was Britain."I am delighted that this law has acted justly, realizing the harm that Farrakhan could have done to Britain, said Lord Janner, chairman from the Holocaust Educational Trust. "The BNP (the far right British National Party) don't require encouragement from the likes of Farrakhan." mulberry briefcases "The only thing I can think about would be...greed and funds." he adds.
News 2s Paul Moniz reports that now theres an exceptional way to stay on track. Thick smoke lingered over scorched homes and roads remained blocked Wednesday after one of the grass fires that raged across Texas consumed a huge number of acres in Cross Plains, an urban area of about 1,000 residents 150 miles southwest of Dallas.A church and a minimum of 25 homes were destroyed and flames burned down power poles in the rural town.Another fire left them with an elderly woman dead, destroyed five homes and charred 5,000 acres Tuesday near Callisburg, a Cooke County community near the Texas-Oklahoma border.Firefighters weren't able to reach the woman, who had apparently fallen and broken her hip, Weaver said."Houses are merely burned down that nobody could find yourself getting to," said rancher Dean Dillard, a former Cross Plains city councilman. "Instantly, there have been 15 or 20 houses burning down at same time and no way to get around to all of which."The blaze was one of the grass fires that burned across a drought-stricken, windy and unseasonably hot Texas on Tuesday, killing at least one person. Authorities believe they were mainly set by people ignoring fire bans and burning trash, shooting fireworks or tossing cigarettes about the crunchy, brown grass."It appeared to be we had been bombed in a big war, the whole city was on fire everywhere," said Dillard.In elements of Texas, 2005 has been driest year since 1956, reports CBS News correspondent Jim Axelrod. The final six months in Oklahoma continues to be the driest half-year on record since 1921."The conditions couldn't be worse for grass fires," said Battalion Chief David Stapp in the Arlington, Texas, Fire Department.Joel Thomas of CBS station KTVT reports the Arlington fire raced across 300 acres in a matter of minutes."Homeowners amazingly were located on their back porches before firefighters arrived, armed with only garden hoses and sprinklers, looking to fend off this fire as the wind whipped toward their houses," Thomas said.The largest fire burned at least 400 acres in the rural area near the town of Mustang, southwest of Oklahoma City, where homeowners also did what they could, reports Doug Warner of CBS affiliate KWTV. no previous page next 1/2
A federal judge has declared unconstitutional part of the USA Patriot Act that bars giving expert consultancy or assistance to groups designated foreign terrorist organizations.The ruling marks the 1st court decision to declare included in the post-Sept. 11 anti-terrorism statute unconstitutional, said David Cole, a Georgetown University law professor who argued true on behalf of the Humanitarian Law Project.Inside a ruling handed down late Friday generating available Monday, U.S. District Judge Audrey Collins said the ban on providing "expert advice or assistance" is impermissibly vague, in violation of the First and Fifth Amendments."The ruling is a setback for the government, but it's a problem that Congress can deal with by simply revising the Patriot Act to create more clear what is permissible expert advice and what is not," reports CBS News Legal Analyst Andrew Cohen. "And truthfully this really is precisely the sort of problem which should have been flagged by the lawyers prior to the Act was passed and signed into law."John Tyler, the Justice Department attorney who argued the truth, had no comment and referred calls towards the department press office in Washington. An email left there was not immediately returned.The truth before the court involved five groups and two U.S. citizens seeking to provide support for lawful, nonviolent activities on behalf of Kurdish refugees in Turkey.The Humanitarian Law Project, which brought the lawsuit, said the plaintiffs were threatened with Fifteen years in prison if they advised groups on seeking a peaceful resolution from the Kurds' campaign for self-determination in Turkey.The judge's ruling said regulations, as written, does not differentiate between impermissible tips on violence and encouraging the use of peaceful, nonviolent methods to achieve goals."The USA Patriot Act places no limitation for the type of expert advice and assistance that's prohibited and instead bans the production of all expert advice and assistance in spite of its nature," the judge said.Cole declared the ruling "a victory for anyone who believes the war on terrorism ought to be fought consistent with constitutional principles." Nineteen months after shooting up a Jewish Center and killing a Filipino-American postal worker, Buford O. Furrow was sentenced Monday one's in prison, without parole, reports CBS News Correspondent David Dow.U.S. District Judge Nora Manella imposed two life sentences without chance of parole, plus 110 years imprisonment and payment of $690,294 in restitution."Your actions were a stern reminder that bigotry is alive," the judge told him. "If you've sent a communication, it is that even the most violent crimes can strengthen a residential district."On Aug. 10, 1999, Furrow stormed in the North Valley Jewish Community Center, that has been packed with children attending day programs, and fired more 70 bullets. Three boys, a teen-age girl as well as a woman were injured.When the rope headed into the San Fernando Valley neighborhood and killed mailman Joseph Ileto, who was shot nine times.Furrow, of Olympia, Wash., had a history of involvement with anti-Semitic groups inside the Pacific Northwest, among them the Aryan Nations.Actually is well liked had a history of mental problems coupled with tried to get help without success, his lawyers said whenever they argued to spare his life.Gary Zidell, whose son, then 6, was one among five wounded in the Jewish Center, wasn't pleased about the sentence."I'm disappointed it took 19 months and nobody is at an execution," he stated.Zidell was one of 16 relatives and victims who made tearful appearances in court to denounce Furrow, as he was sentenced. APJoseph Ileto's mother, sister and brother "This person had no regard at all for people as well as their family," Ismael Ileto, brother in the murdered letter carrier, later told reporters. "I'm just glad that he's put away and he won't be able to harm others."Added Ileto's mother, Lillian, in court, "when he killed my son, also, he killed a part of me."Furrow was sentenced within a plea bargain, prompted by the past of mental illness. When arrested the next day the shootings in Las Vegas, Bufurd Furrow allegedly told authorities he'd been sending a "a wake-up call to Americans to kill Jews." Problem, he read a statement an apology stating: "I think of what happened every day and will grieve throughout my life." Furrow said he harbors no ill feelings toward anyone associated with a race or religion. What does prosecutor Michael Genaco make of the statement?"If, actually, it's a genuine statement, it is really an important first step in regard to this kind of defendant," he said. "It cannot, because the vitims say, replicate or bring back the victims and bring back the innocence of the children who were affected by this incident."Mindy Finkelstein, who was simply a 16-year-old camp counselor on the Jewish Center, was wounded in the attack."I've been to hell and back," she told the judge. "Buford Furrow experimented with kill me and he failed. But in a way he succeeded."©MMI Viacom Internet Services Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press led to this report
First there was the nicotine patch. Now there exists a contraceptive patch, and a new study shows it is as effective as oral contraceptives. CBS News Correspondent Russ Mitchell reports. mulberry fashion What does embryonic stem cell research entail? Exactly what is the hope? Where does the research currently stand? CBS News medical correspondent Elizabeth Kaledin explains.
|
| |
| |
